Lets examine the pseudo logic and endless string of unsubstantiated claims from the (trash heap) www.
Nisha writes:
I can only assume the author of this blog is a white man. You will never fully understand Buddhism as true Buddhists can and do…your general attitude in your little opener shows you are not Buddhist, nor could you grasp it's meaning or put it into practice. Your little opener there is quite anti-Buddhist actually. Will you publish this? Or no, since it is (in your eyes) negative about your blog? I am simply speaking truth. White authors. I have no problem with white people, but when you were born and raised a Buddhist, and a very religious one at that, you know more than some white man or any other color human being for that matter who has read a lot of books, most of which carry few facts of true Buddhism. I only comment because I find your blog offensive to actual Buddhist lay people, like myself, who has practiced and studied my faith my entire life. ---Nisha (a typical pseudo-intellectual unintelligent bitch without a capacity for logic, reason, and deductive faculties)
A: It is an “either or” fallacy to presume that anyone well read/studied in the texts of earliest Buddhism is not one possessed of gnosis (nan’a/wisdom). This heretical fallacy is common amongst unintelligent rabble.
B: The statement “your general attitude in your little opener shows you are not Buddhist” is merely a baseless claim. In fact all Buddhologists have concluded that present-day Buddhism is wholly unlike the original. You are refuted forthwith.
C: The endless statements about “white people” is not only an obtuse and irrelevant ad hominem, but Gotama’s people were Arya Scythian white peoples. In referring to Gotama the “Scythian-sage” (Sakyamuni), he: [DN 3.144] “has blue eyes”. In further at [DN 3.81] the true Brahmins are “fair skinned, whereas the others (inferiors) are dark-skinned”. You are refuted forthwith.
D: Your comment “born & raised a Buddhist” is an enormous contradiction to Buddhist doctrine in any translation, for one is not sakyaputtabandhu (born a follower of Shakyamuni), i.e. a Rishi (isi). The notion of “born a Buddhist” exists nowhere in doctrine and is ultimately contradictory to the very premise of same in the original and earliest texts. You are refuted forthwith.
E: Your comment “I find your blog offensive” is in fact a compliment, for as Plato said “to insult a fool is the praise of wisdom”. I have always endeavored to insult the bestial minds of the low, the base, the unintelligent, the unilluminated ritualistic religion tripe of which you are obviously a lemming thereof.
Aryan-Buddhism blogspot is devoted to original Buddhism, Traditionalist metaphysics, and the gnosis advocated thereof, as such it is an anti-Guru, anti-Zen-Master, anti-Lama, anti-Rimpoche, and anti-bhikkhu site adverse to any and all forms of superficial spiritual-materialism, petty ritualisms, and the New-Age movement in general. Aryan-Buddhism blogspot is equally adversarial to those who find counterfeit peace and grace in spiritual trinkets, empirical pietism such as extreme bodily austerities such as chanting, bowing, self-mortification, or those who find love towards cultish Guru-personalities, other such pseudo-religious rubbish and meaningless corporeal endeavors which are irrelevant to the gnosis which culminates in the noetic liberation of spirit.
Aryan-Buddhism blogspot content is hostile to illogical systems such as: secular humanism, creationism, atheism, agnosticism, and the mass of pseudo-religionists such as those who claim to be ‘Buddhists’, and spiritual…yet deny the very spirit (atman, citta, nous) which is the only refuge and light proclaimed in and of Buddhism and metaphysics at large. All of the above applies to yourself, and therefore Aryan-Buddhism blogspot will not appeal to you whatsoever; ...as said, "In praising wisdom, one simultaneously insults fools, those who cleave to things unwise." You are refuted forthwith.
F: Your comment “…practiced my entire life”. I might point out to you that your base and pathetic cultish rituals, brass statues, bowing, paying homage to brainless bald monks, lifetime or not, has no merit, no weight, no status in the arena of illumination, of wisdom. You are a religionist, not a metaphysician. Utterly no different than a rotten brat dragged to church since he was in diapers. You are refuted forthwith.
Like most miserable and unintelligent lemming-trash on the internet, you make many many claims, but prove none. You puff and blow about matters to which you have neither studied nor pontificated. Many lives lay ahead of you contrary to your perverse delusions that your ritualistic and religious life might bring false hope to a noble end to which you shall not gain.
* As a woman yourself, I will iiluminate to you Gotama Shakyamuni's position regarding women:
“In crossing the river (from samsara to emancipation) …crocodiles are a designation for women” -MN3-Gotama
“If it were not for women being admitted into (our order), my teachings would have lasted 1000 years, …now they will not last 500”-DN3 Gotama
“Women, with their two-fingered wisdom (i.e. stupid), have a difficult time (understanding what I teach)”-SN4 -Gotama
"It CANNOT happen that a woman may become a Tathagata, a sammsambuddha" -AN 3.14 Gotama
This, readers, is the absolute norm personage you will find in “dhamma-centers” and in S.E. Asian temples. They are miserable and unintelligent ritualistic lemmings who have not seen the light of genuine Selfhood.
Or, might I quote the following:
“Buddhism (modern) is an extremely sick religion inhabited by atheists, agnostics, and at best pantheists. They congregate together at ‘dharma-centers’, which are little more than outpatient mental wards for depressed materialists, and engage in idle chatter about attainment of oblivion and the denial of all things spiritual.
The only difference between the typical ‘Buddhist’ and the Islamo-Fascist suicide bomber who straps explosives to himself and enters a crowd of infidels, is that the ‘Buddhist’ has set out to annihilate himself only, thru spiritual euthanasia practices. Both of these types are the worst lot of demons which roam samsara and plague others with their bestial ignorances.” -Dr. Rama T. Guptar
Sincerely, webmaster Aryan Buddhism blogspot.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I think there is a something in what you say, but you seem an extremely irritable and angry person. I wonder whether one who had realized the transmundane reality of which the metaphysicians speak, would be so concerned with the opinions of others or with proving this his view alone among all is correct. By the fruit shall the tree be judged, and much of the fruit here has a very bitter taste.
You claim to be a published author on the subject of Buddhism, as well as getting paid to lecture on Buddhism. I'm very curious to know where you lecture, and where I could purchase your books.
Post a Comment